Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management1.5k
Strategy and Management2.0k
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.1k
Information Systems and Management815
Management Science and Operations Research1.4k
Replace Insper with:
InsperBrazil
Fucape Business SchoolBrazil
Escola Superior de Propaganda e MarketingBrazil
Institute of Applied Economic ResearchBrazil
Escola Brasileira de Economia e FinançasBrazil
Central Bank of BrazilBrazil
Universidade Candido MendesBrazil
Agência Nacional de Energia ElétricaBrazil
Centro Brasileiro de Análise e PlanejamentoBrazil
Universidad ORT UruguayUruguay
Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitaisrelative toInsperBrazilInsper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Insper · 1×
×1.12k/1kOBHRM
×0.52k/4kSM
×0.81k/1kGEEF
×1.6815/505ISM
×2.11k/661MSOR
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries citing scholars working at Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais at the time of their publication.
About Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais have published 958 papers, which have received a total of 11.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 146 papers in Information Systems and Management, 124 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 127 papers in Finance, 233 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 95 papers in Accounting on the topics of Business and Management Studies (125 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (72 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (65 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (54 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (53 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (51 papers), Economic theories and models (41 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.5k citations), Strategy and Management (2.0k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.1k citations), Information Systems and Management (815 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (1.4k citations). Authors at Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Economics Letters, Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, International Journal of Production Economics, Economic Theory and International Review of Financial Analysis. Some of Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais's most productive authors include Flávia Cavazotte, Sérgio G. Lazzarini, Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes, Nathan S. Hartman, Larry J. Williams, Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel, Valter Moreno, Naércio Aquino Menezes-Filho, Luiz F. Mesquita and Pedro L. Valls Pereira.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact