Harvard University Press

4.7M citations
67.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Harvard University Press

57.0k papers receiving 4.1M citations

Peers

Harvard University Press
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • General Decision Sciences 34.0k
  • Economics and Econometrics 367.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 237.8k
  • Accounting 143.4k
  • Finance 119.2k
Replace Massachusetts Institute of Technology with:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology United States
New York University United States
Yale University United States
Princeton University United States
Columbia University United States
Boston University United States
Cornell University United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey United States
Dartmouth College United States
Harvard University Press relative to Massachusetts Institute of Technology United States Massachusetts Institute of Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Harvard University Press

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Harvard University Press. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Harvard University Press with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvard University Press more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Harvard University Press

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Harvard University Press at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Harvard University Press at the time of their publication.

About Harvard University Press

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Harvard University Press have published 67.8k papers, which have received a total of 4.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 403 papers in General Decision Sciences, 5.3k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 1.3k papers in Statistics and Probability, 2.8k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6.4k papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (667 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (586 papers), Economic theories and models (520 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (517 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (516 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (499 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (495 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (490 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (34.0k citations), Economics and Econometrics (367.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (237.8k citations), Accounting (143.4k citations) and Finance (119.2k citations). Authors at Harvard University Press collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Science and Physical Review Letters. Some of Harvard University Press's most productive authors include George Miller, Andrei Shleifer, Julian Schwinger, Paul Pierson, Pippa Norris, Gordon W. Āllport, Donald B. Rubin, Michael Spence, John W. Hutchinson and Amy C. Edmondson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact