Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Papers in
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 93
- Healthcare Policy and Management 20
-
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies 16
- Top scholars
- Yot TeerawattananonMontarat ThavorncharoensapJürgen RehmJayadeep PatraSvetlana PopovaColin MathersMark JitSripen Tantivess
- Journals
- Value in Health (21 papers)PLoS ONE (20 papers)International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (19 papers)BMC Health Services Research (12 papers)BMC Public Health (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- ThailandSingaporeUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program
243 papers receiving 7.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
- Health 717
- Economics and Econometrics 2.1k
- Modeling and Simulation 293
- Epidemiology 1.9k
- General Health Professions 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program at the time of their publication.
About Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program have published 337 papers, which have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 103 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 16 papers in Modeling and Simulation, 16 papers in Health, 21 papers in Finance and 41 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (93 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (24 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (20 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (20 papers), Global Health Care Issues (17 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (16 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (14 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (717 citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.1k citations), Modeling and Simulation (293 citations), Epidemiology (1.9k citations) and General Health Professions (1.1k citations). Authors at Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program collaborate with scholars in Thailand, Singapore and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Value in Health, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, BMC Health Services Research and BMC Public Health. Some of Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program's most productive authors include Yot Teerawattananon, Montarat Thavorncharoensap, Jürgen Rehm, Jayadeep Patra, Svetlana Popova, Colin Mathers, Mark Jit, Sripen Tantivess, Olivier J. Wouters and Heidi J. Larson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.