Haverford College
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 160
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 91
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 73
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 73
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 69
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology 64
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 73
- Top scholars
- J. P. GollubFrederic PalmerD. TaborFrank Philip BowdenMarilyn G. BoltzWilliam C. DavidonDale H. HusemollerRebecca J. Compton
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (92 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (85 papers)Physical Review Letters (44 papers)Biochemistry (27 papers)Physics Today (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Haverford College
2.5k papers receiving 106.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 14.2k
- Instrumentation 3.0k
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 568
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1.1k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 6.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Haverford College
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Haverford College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Haverford College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haverford College more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Haverford College
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Haverford College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Haverford College at the time of their publication.
About Haverford College
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Haverford College have published 2.9k papers, which have received a total of 115.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 353 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 73 papers in Instrumentation, 45 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 143 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 81 papers in Geometry and Topology on the topics of Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (160 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (91 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (73 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (73 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (73 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (69 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (68 papers) and Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (64 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (14.2k citations), Instrumentation (3.0k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (568 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (1.1k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6.6k citations). Authors at Haverford College collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, Physical Review Letters, Biochemistry and Physics Today. Some of Haverford College's most productive authors include J. P. Gollub, Frederic Palmer, D. Tabor, Frank Philip Bowden, Marilyn G. Boltz, William C. Davidon, Dale H. Husemoller, Rebecca J. Compton, Joshua Schrier and Henry D. I. Abarbanel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.