San Francisco Foundation

89.9k citations
2.3k papers ·

Impact in

    • Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
    • Ocular Infections and Treatments
    • Reproductive tract infections research

Papers in

    • Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 218
    • Ocular Infections and Treatments 200
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions 65
    • Reproductive tract infections research 199

San Francisco Foundation

2.0k papers receiving 80.6k citations

Peers

San Francisco Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Ophthalmology 13.3k
  • Microbiology 6.8k
  • Parasitology 3.5k
  • Immunology 9.5k
  • Virology 1.9k
Replace Sunesis (United States) with:
Sunesis (United States) United States
New Frontier United States
Roche (United States) United States
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center United States
QB3 United States
The Lundquist Institute United States
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) United States
J. Craig Venter Institute United States
USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center United States
La Jolla Institute for Immunology United States
San Francisco Foundation relative to Sunesis (United States) United States Sunesis (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.9×
Sunesis (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at San Francisco Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at San Francisco Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at San Francisco Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites San Francisco Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at San Francisco Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with San Francisco Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with San Francisco Foundation at the time of their publication.

About San Francisco Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with San Francisco Foundation have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 89.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 523 papers in Ophthalmology, 226 papers in Microbiology, 117 papers in Parasitology, 406 papers in Epidemiology and 197 papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (218 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (200 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (199 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (131 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (116 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (94 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (68 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (65 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (13.3k citations), Microbiology (6.8k citations), Parasitology (3.5k citations), Immunology (9.5k citations) and Virology (1.9k citations). Authors at San Francisco Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, India and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Cornea and British Journal of Ophthalmology. Some of San Francisco Foundation's most productive authors include J. Michael Bishop, Anthony DeFranco, Frances M. Brodsky, Richard S. Stephens, John P. Whitcher, Todd P. Margolis, Thomas M. Lietman, Nisha R. Acharya, David C. Gritz and Travis C. Porco.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact