George Washington University

58.9k papers receiving 1.8M citations

Peers

George Washington University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Nephrology 33.0k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 70.0k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 48.0k
  • Parasitology 28.3k
  • Strategy and Management 69.8k
Replace University of Virginia with:
University of Virginia United States
Georgetown University United States
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey United States
Pennsylvania State University United States
Temple University United States
Duke University United States
University of Rochester United States
University at Buffalo, State University of New York United States
Case Western Reserve University United States
New York University United States
George Washington University relative to University of Virginia United States University of Virginia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Virginia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at George Washington University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at George Washington University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at George Washington University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Washington University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at George Washington University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with George Washington University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with George Washington University at the time of their publication.

About George Washington University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with George Washington University have published 70.0k papers, which have received a total of 2.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.3k papers in General Health Professions, 1.1k papers in Emergency Medicine, 3.9k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 1.1k papers in Statistics and Probability and 3.4k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (728 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (705 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (573 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (491 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (487 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (472 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (460 papers) and HIV Research and Treatment (454 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nephrology (33.0k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (70.0k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (48.0k citations), Parasitology (28.3k citations) and Strategy and Management (69.8k citations). Authors at George Washington University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, PEDIATRICS, Scientific Reports, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Some of George Washington University's most productive authors include Annamaria Lusardi, Elias G. Carayannis, John M. Lachin, Hubert W. Lilliefors, Ronald Weitzer, William A. Knaus, Amitaï Etzioni, Jack E. Zimmerman, Peter J. Hotez and Paul L. Kimmel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact