GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
Papers in
-
- Survey Methodology and Nonresponse 293
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 66
- Top scholars
- Beatrice RammstedtEldad DavidovClemens M. LechnerSebastian StierMarkus StrohmaierDorothée BehrDaniel DannerPhilipp Mayr
- Journals
- Social Science Computer Review (42 papers)PLoS ONE (26 papers)Field Methods (21 papers)Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology (21 papers)International Journal of Social Research Methodology (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
1.7k papers receiving 33.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
- Communication 2.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 9.8k
- General Social Sciences 537
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.1k
- Safety Research 1.6k
Countries citing scholars working at GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences at the time of their publication.
About GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences have published 2k papers, which have received a total of 33.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 59 papers in General Social Sciences, 691 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 323 papers in Information Systems, 114 papers in Communication and 97 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty on the topics of Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (293 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (131 papers), Research Data Management Practices (130 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (119 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (109 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (91 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (66 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (63 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Communication (2.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (9.8k citations), General Social Sciences (537 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.1k citations) and Safety Research (1.6k citations). Authors at GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Social Science Computer Review, PLoS ONE, Field Methods, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology and International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Some of GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences's most productive authors include Beatrice Rammstedt, Eldad Davidov, Clemens M. Lechner, Sebastian Stier, Markus Strohmaier, Dorothée Behr, Daniel Danner, Philipp Mayr, Constanze Beierlein and Claudia Wagner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.