Foundation for Professional Development

5.5k citations
335 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Reproductive tract infections research 35
    • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 52
    • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 13

Foundation for Professional Development

250 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

Foundation for Professional Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Microbiology 403
  • Infectious Diseases 851
  • Oceanography 555
  • Research and Theory 27
  • Health 252
Replace Botswana Open University with:
Botswana Open University Botswana
International Centre for Reproductive Health Mozambique
Government of South Africa South Africa
IIE MSA South Africa
Clinvet South Africa
Research ICT Africa South Africa
Catholic University of Mozambique Mozambique
Christian Health Association of Malawi Malawi
Population Services International Zambia
Zambart Zambia
Foundation for Professional Development relative to Botswana Open University Botswana Botswana Open University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×55.5×
Botswana Open University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Foundation for Professional Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Foundation for Professional Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Foundation for Professional Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foundation for Professional Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Foundation for Professional Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Foundation for Professional Development at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Foundation for Professional Development at the time of their publication.

About Foundation for Professional Development

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Foundation for Professional Development have published 335 papers, which have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 35 papers in Microbiology, 71 papers in Infectious Diseases, 3 papers in Research and Theory, 65 papers in General Health Professions and 19 papers in Health on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (52 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (35 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (27 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (13 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (12 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers) and Sex work and related issues (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Microbiology (403 citations), Infectious Diseases (851 citations), Oceanography (555 citations), Research and Theory (27 citations) and Health (252 citations). Authors at Foundation for Professional Development collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health, AIDS and Behavior, Journal of the International AIDS Society and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Some of Foundation for Professional Development's most productive authors include Aída Walqui, Richard Maitland Laws, W. R. Siegfried, Simukai Shamu, Andrew Medina‐Marino, Remco Petrus Hendricus Peters, Troy Wayne Hicks, Lynette Harris, David A. Lane and Maretha J. Visser.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact