Foundation for Professional Development

286 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

Foundation for Professional Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Research and Theory 57
  • Microbiology 377
  • Oceanography 555
  • Infectious Diseases 744
  • Public Administration 152
Replace Botswana Open University with:
Botswana Open University Botswana
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research Zimbabwe
Population Services International Zambia
Christian Health Association of Malawi Malawi
Research for Equity And Community Health Trust Malawi
Women's University in Africa Zimbabwe
Iringa Mercy Organization Tanzania
Haydom Lutheran Hospital Tanzania
Rwanda Development Board Rwanda
Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia Angola
Foundation for Professional Development relative to Botswana Open University Botswana Botswana Open University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32.6×
Botswana Open University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Foundation for Professional Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Foundation for Professional Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Foundation for Professional Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foundation for Professional Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Foundation for Professional Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Foundation for Professional Development at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Foundation for Professional Development at the time of their publication.

About Foundation for Professional Development

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Foundation for Professional Development have published 404 papers, which have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 33 papers in Microbiology, 4 papers in Research and Theory, 67 papers in Infectious Diseases, 64 papers in General Health Professions and 17 papers in Health on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (50 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (33 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (25 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (12 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (10 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (57 citations), Microbiology (377 citations), Oceanography (555 citations), Infectious Diseases (744 citations) and Public Administration (152 citations). Authors at Foundation for Professional Development collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health, Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, Journal of the International AIDS Society and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Some of Foundation for Professional Development's most productive authors include W. R. Siegfried, R. M. Laws, Troy Wayne Hicks, Fiona Gardner, Jan Fook, Simukai Shamu, Andrew Medina‐Marino, Tamara L. Jetton, Lynette Harris and Remco P. H. Peters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact