Franklin & Marshall College

92.4k citations
3.3k papers ·

Impact in

  • Geophysics top 5%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
    • earthquake and tectonic studies
    • High-pressure geophysics and materials

Papers in

Franklin & Marshall College

2.9k papers receiving 86.9k citations

Peers

Franklin & Marshall College
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Geophysics 7.6k
  • Social Psychology 9.2k
  • Developmental Biology 890
  • Earth-Surface Processes 2.7k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 7.3k
Replace Bucknell University with:
Bucknell University United States
Colgate University United States
Bryn Mawr College United States
Vassar College United States
Amherst College United States
Brooklyn College United States
Union College United States
Williams College United States
Ithaca College United States
Smith College United States
Franklin & Marshall College relative to Bucknell University United States Bucknell University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Bucknell University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Franklin & Marshall College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Franklin & Marshall College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Franklin & Marshall College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Franklin & Marshall College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Franklin & Marshall College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Franklin & Marshall College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Franklin & Marshall College at the time of their publication.

About Franklin & Marshall College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Franklin & Marshall College have published 3.3k papers, which have received a total of 92.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 302 papers in Social Psychology, 30 papers in Developmental Biology, 259 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 167 papers in Geophysics and 104 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (125 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (106 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (104 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (82 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (70 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (66 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (52 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (51 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geophysics (7.6k citations), Social Psychology (9.2k citations), Developmental Biology (890 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (2.7k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (7.3k citations). Authors at Franklin & Marshall College collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Physical Review A, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Geological Society of America Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Biology. Some of Franklin & Marshall College's most productive authors include Michael L. Anderson, Anthony P. Chemero, Dorothy J. Merritts, John J. McDermott, Robert A. Wiebe, Jeffrey Steven Podoshen, D. Alfred Owens, Bennett W. Helm, Christina Puff and Gregory S. Adkins.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact