Fort Lewis College

888 papers receiving 27.3k citations

Peers

Fort Lewis College
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Developmental Biology 648
  • Global and Planetary Change 3.7k
  • Applied Psychology 711
  • Computer Science Applications 655
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
Replace University of Nebraska at Kearney with:
University of Nebraska at Kearney United States
University of Nebraska System United States
Colorado Mesa University United States
Metropolitan State University of Denver United States
Emporia State University United States
Whitman College United States
Scripps College United States
Regis University United States
Fort Hays State University United States
Tarleton State University United States
Fort Lewis College relative to University of Nebraska at Kearney United States University of Nebraska at Kearney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
University of Nebraska at Kearney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fort Lewis College

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fort Lewis College. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fort Lewis College with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fort Lewis College more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fort Lewis College

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fort Lewis College at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fort Lewis College at the time of their publication.

About Fort Lewis College

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fort Lewis College have published 974 papers, which have received a total of 27.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 39 papers in Computer Science Applications, 4 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 7 papers in Developmental Biology, 10 papers in Library and Information Sciences and 61 papers in Ecology on the topics of Teaching and Learning Programming (36 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (28 papers), Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems (22 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (22 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (20 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (17 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (14 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (648 citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.7k citations), Applied Psychology (711 citations), Computer Science Applications (655 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations). Authors at Fort Lewis College collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of American History, Western Historical Quarterly, Landscape Ecology, School Science and Mathematics and Environmental Science & Technology. Some of Fort Lewis College's most productive authors include Brian L. Burke, William H. Romme, Monica G. Turner, John Byrd, Kent A. Hickman, Brad Lundahl, Robert H. Gardner, William B. Dodds, Hal S. Arkowitz and Marisa Menchola.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact