Foundation for laboratory medicine

522 papers receiving 23.4k citations

Peers

Foundation for laboratory medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 2.7k
  • Immunology 2.7k
  • Molecular Biology 7.8k
  • Surgery 4.4k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 871
Replace Polyclinic Medical University with:
Polyclinic Medical University Switzerland
Augenstern Germany
Eli Lilly (Germany) Germany
Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing Netherlands
GlaxoSmithKline (France) France
Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics France
Fresenius (Germany) Germany
St. Claraspital Switzerland
München Klinik Harlaching Germany
Laboratoire de Recherche sur la Croissance Cellulaire, la Réparation et la Régénération Tissulaires France
Foundation for laboratory medicine relative to Polyclinic Medical University Switzerland Polyclinic Medical University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Polyclinic Medical University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Foundation for laboratory medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Foundation for laboratory medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Foundation for laboratory medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foundation for laboratory medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Foundation for laboratory medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Foundation for laboratory medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Foundation for laboratory medicine at the time of their publication.

About Foundation for laboratory medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Foundation for laboratory medicine have published 581 papers, which have received a total of 26.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 60 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 26 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 69 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 102 papers in Epidemiology and 25 papers in Reproductive Medicine on the topics of Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (57 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (34 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (27 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (24 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (20 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (20 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (19 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (2.7k citations), Immunology (2.7k citations), Molecular Biology (7.8k citations), Surgery (4.4k citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (871 citations). Authors at Foundation for laboratory medicine collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Calcified Tissue International and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Some of Foundation for laboratory medicine's most productive authors include Fabrizio Montecucco, François Mach, Werner Schlegel, François Mach, Sabine Steffens, Lawrence J. Wardzala, Samuel W. Cushman, H. Fleisch, Vincent Braunersreuther and Flore Mulhaupt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact