Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing
Impact in
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Aging top 5%
Papers in
- Aging 23
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 23
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 135
- Top scholars
- Hans F. A. VasenRudi G. J. WestendorpP. Eline SlagboomJukka‐Pekka MecklinAnton J.M. de CraenH. LynchAndrea B. MaierPeter H. Watson
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (28 papers)Familial Cancer (18 papers)International Journal of Cancer (17 papers)Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (16 papers)Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing
648 papers receiving 33.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 9.3k
- Aging 966
- Oncology 6.7k
- Cancer Research 3.7k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 573
Countries citing scholars working at Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing at the time of their publication.
About Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing have published 751 papers, which have received a total of 40.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 23 papers in Aging, 142 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 73 papers in Cancer Research, 90 papers in Oncology and 48 papers in Rheumatology on the topics of Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (135 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (44 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (40 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (32 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (28 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (26 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (23 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pathology and Forensic Medicine (9.3k citations), Aging (966 citations), Oncology (6.7k citations), Cancer Research (3.7k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (573 citations). Authors at Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Familial Cancer, International Journal of Cancer, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. Some of Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing's most productive authors include Hans F. A. Vasen, Rudi G. J. Westendorp, P. Eline Slagboom, Jukka‐Pekka Mecklin, Anton J.M. de Craen, H. Lynch, Andrea B. Maier, Peter H. Watson, André Hoekema and Albert Hofman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.