Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover

226 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 266
  • Small Animals 170
  • Microbiology 131
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 75
  • Immunology 403
Replace Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research with:
Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research Germany
Novartis Foundation Switzerland
Pfizer (Belgium) Belgium
Nierenzentrum Heidelberg Germany
Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp Belgium
Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre Netherlands
Hewlett-Packard (Germany) Germany
Centre for Individualised Infection Medicine Germany
Qiagen (Germany) Germany
Stiftung Juliusspital Germany
Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover relative to Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research Germany Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover at the time of their publication.

About Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover have published 262 papers, which have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4 papers in Health Informatics, 16 papers in Small Animals, 38 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 2 papers in Equine and 1 paper in General Energy on the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers), Ethics in medical practice (11 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (7 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (6 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (266 citations), Small Animals (170 citations), Microbiology (131 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (75 citations) and Immunology (403 citations). Authors at Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of Chromatography A, Cell and Tissue Research, Pediatric Anesthesia and Bioethics. Some of Research Institute for Philosophy Hannover's most productive authors include Joachim Tiedemann, Wolf‐Georg Forssmann, Sascha Schanze, Thorsten Bell, Rolf Ploetzner, Detlef Urhahne, Peter Koslowski, Ludwig Haas, Hans‐Jürgen Mägert and Ludger Ständker.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact