FEU Institute of Technology

3.4k citations
393 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

FEU Institute of Technology

305 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

FEU Institute of Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Health Informatics 181
  • Computer Science Applications 229
  • Information Systems 541
  • Human-Computer Interaction 141
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 44
Replace Bulacan State University with:
Bulacan State University Philippines
Adamson University Philippines
University of the Cordilleras Philippines
Technological University of the Philippines Philippines
Technological Institute of the Philippines-Quezon City Philippines
Yango University China
Technological Institute of the Philippines Philippines
Batangas State University Philippines
University of Saint Joseph China
West Visayas State University Philippines
FEU Institute of Technology relative to Bulacan State University Philippines Bulacan State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
Bulacan State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at FEU Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at FEU Institute of Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at FEU Institute of Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites FEU Institute of Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at FEU Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with FEU Institute of Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with FEU Institute of Technology at the time of their publication.

About FEU Institute of Technology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with FEU Institute of Technology have published 393 papers, which have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 34 papers in Computer Science Applications, 19 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 58 papers in Information Systems, 6 papers in Energy Engineering and Power Technology and 5 papers in Health Informatics on the topics of Artificial Intelligence in Education (22 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (20 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (19 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (16 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (14 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (12 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (10 papers) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Informatics (181 citations), Computer Science Applications (229 citations), Information Systems (541 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (141 citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (44 citations). Authors at FEU Institute of Technology collaborate with scholars in Philippines, South Korea and Thailand and have published in prestigious journals including Education and Information Technologies, Interactive Learning Environments, Results in Engineering, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy and International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. Some of FEU Institute of Technology's most productive authors include Manuel Garcia, Ace Carpio Lagman, Ian B. Benitez, Ivan Henderson V. Gue, Aristotle T. Ubando, Yunifa Miftachul Arif, Raymond R. Tan, Renato Racelis Maaliw III, Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef and Abdulsalam Salihu Mustafa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact