Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- General Energy top 1%
Papers in
-
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 487
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth 156
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 153
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 140
- Market Dynamics and Volatility 102
- Top scholars
- Carlo CarraroMassimo TavoniMarzio GaleottiMatteo ManeraValentina BosettiElena VerdoliniAlessandro LanzaDomenico Siniscalco
- Journals
- Energy Economics (46 papers)Climatic Change (31 papers)Energy Policy (31 papers)Environmental and Resource Economics (29 papers)Sustainability (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
1.5k papers receiving 46.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
- Economics and Econometrics 24.5k
- General Energy 873
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 10.7k
- Environmental Engineering 7.4k
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology 1.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei at the time of their publication.
About Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 48.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 64 papers in General Energy, 943 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 336 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 123 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 169 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Climate Change Policy and Economics (487 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (213 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (156 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (153 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (149 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (140 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (117 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (102 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (24.5k citations), General Energy (873 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (10.7k citations), Environmental Engineering (7.4k citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (1.5k citations). Authors at Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei collaborate with scholars in Italy, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Energy Economics, Climatic Change, Energy Policy, Environmental and Resource Economics and Sustainability. Some of Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei's most productive authors include Carlo Carraro, Massimo Tavoni, Marzio Galeotti, Matteo Manera, Valentina Bosetti, Elena Verdolini, Alessandro Lanza, Domenico Siniscalco, Enrica De Cian and Carlo Giupponi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.