Freshwater Biological Association

112.6k citations
2.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Freshwater Biological Association

2.1k papers receiving 109.9k citations

Peers

Freshwater Biological Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Environmental Chemistry 34.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 25.6k
  • Ecology 51.6k
  • Oceanography 24.2k
  • Aquatic Science 13.0k
Replace Environment Agency with:
Environment Agency United Kingdom
Marine Scotland United Kingdom
Natural Environment Research Council United Kingdom
Scottish Association For Marine Science United Kingdom
Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom United Kingdom
Plymouth Marine Laboratory United Kingdom
James Hutton Institute United Kingdom
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science United Kingdom
Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer France
Ecosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution France
Freshwater Biological Association relative to Environment Agency United Kingdom Environment Agency's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Environment Agency · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Freshwater Biological Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Freshwater Biological Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Freshwater Biological Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freshwater Biological Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Freshwater Biological Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Freshwater Biological Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Freshwater Biological Association at the time of their publication.

About Freshwater Biological Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Freshwater Biological Association have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 112.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 611 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 560 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 309 papers in Aquatic Science, 959 papers in Ecology and 392 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (527 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (426 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (325 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (274 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (240 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (193 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (161 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (160 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Environmental Chemistry (34.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (25.6k citations), Ecology (51.6k citations), Oceanography (24.2k citations) and Aquatic Science (13.0k citations). Authors at Freshwater Biological Association collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark and have published in prestigious journals including Freshwater Biology, Journal of Fish Biology, Hydrobiologia, Limnology and Oceanography and Nature. Some of Freshwater Biological Association's most productive authors include COLIN S. REYNOLDS, Edward Tipping, Bland J. Finlay, J. M. Elliott, P.A. Cranwell, Alan D. Pickering, T.G. Pottinger, Geoffrey Fryer, Jack F. Talling and John Lund.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact