Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium)

10.2k citations
547 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium)

505 papers receiving 9.9k citations

Peers

Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium)
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • Polymers and Plastics 2.9k
  • Bioengineering 402
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 581
  • Materials Chemistry 2.6k
  • Organic Chemistry 1.5k
Replace Wilton Park with:
Wilton Park United Kingdom
Eastman Chemical Company (Germany) Germany
Battelle-Institut ev Germany
Photonic Science (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
École nationale supérieure de chimie de Mulhouse France
Surface du Verre et Interfaces France
Materia Nova Belgium
Clermont-Ferrand’s Superior National School of Chemistry France
Hexagon (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de Grenoble France
Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium) relative to Wilton Park United Kingdom Wilton Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Wilton Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium) at the time of their publication.

About Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium) have published 547 papers, which have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 70 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 34 papers in Radiation, 13 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 31 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and 86 papers in Organic Chemistry on the topics of Conducting polymers and applications (40 papers), Color Science and Applications (36 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (33 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (24 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (22 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (21 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (21 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (2.9k citations), Bioengineering (402 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (581 citations), Materials Chemistry (2.6k citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.5k citations). Authors at Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium) collaborate with scholars in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including The Imaging Science Journal, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Crystal Growth, Synthetic Metals and Macromolecules. Some of Agfa-Gevaert (Belgium)'s most productive authors include R. J. Hart, André Conix, L. Groenendaal, F. Louwet, P. Vuylsteke, Gianni Zotti, Freddy Zutterman, W. R. Salaneck, A. Oosterlinck and Xavier Crispin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact