European Forest Institute
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Forest Management and Policy
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest Management and Policy 234
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 30
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 26
-
- Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development 47
- Top scholars
- G.J. NabuursMarcus LindnerMart‐Jan SchelhaasPieter Johannes VerkerkJari LiskiRupert SeidlAndreas SchuckTimo Karjalainen
- Journals
- Forest Policy and Economics (47 papers)Forest Ecology and Management (37 papers)Agroforestry Systems (12 papers)Land Use Policy (12 papers)Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- FinlandGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
European Forest Institute
478 papers receiving 31.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Global and Planetary Change 13.9k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 5.9k
- Forestry 1.2k
- Soil Science 3.5k
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2k
Countries citing scholars working at European Forest Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at European Forest Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at European Forest Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Forest Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at European Forest Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with European Forest Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with European Forest Institute at the time of their publication.
About European Forest Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with European Forest Institute have published 497 papers, which have received a total of 31.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 288 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 57 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 68 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 22 papers in Forestry and 52 papers in Environmental Engineering on the topics of Forest Management and Policy (234 papers), Forest ecology and management (60 papers), Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (47 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (30 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (29 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (26 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (21 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (13.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (5.9k citations), Forestry (1.2k citations), Soil Science (3.5k citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (2k citations). Authors at European Forest Institute collaborate with scholars in Finland, Germany and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Policy and Economics, Forest Ecology and Management, Agroforestry Systems, Land Use Policy and Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. Some of European Forest Institute's most productive authors include G.J. Nabuurs, Marcus Lindner, Mart‐Jan Schelhaas, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Jari Liski, Rupert Seidl, Andreas Schuck, Timo Karjalainen, Marc Hanewinkel and Lauri Hetemäki.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.