German Centre of Gerontology

14.4k citations
502 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

German Centre of Gerontology

403 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

German Centre of Gerontology
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2.2k
  • Health 2.3k
  • Applied Psychology 1.2k
  • General Decision Sciences 302
  • Demography 1.9k
Replace Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology with:
Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology Netherlands
Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy Germany
Institute for Social Research Croatia
Amsterdam University College Netherlands
Norwegian Directorate of Health Norway
Collegium Helveticum Switzerland
Alice-Salomon-Hochschule Berlin Germany
VIZJA University Poland
Schön Klinik Roseneck Germany
Arkin Netherlands
German Centre of Gerontology relative to Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology Netherlands Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.0×
Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at German Centre of Gerontology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at German Centre of Gerontology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at German Centre of Gerontology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites German Centre of Gerontology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at German Centre of Gerontology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with German Centre of Gerontology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with German Centre of Gerontology at the time of their publication.

About German Centre of Gerontology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with German Centre of Gerontology have published 502 papers, which have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 76 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 92 papers in Health, 102 papers in Demography, 37 papers in Applied Psychology and 147 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Health disparities and outcomes (92 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (76 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (76 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (73 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (41 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (41 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (40 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2.2k citations), Health (2.3k citations), Applied Psychology (1.2k citations), General Decision Sciences (302 citations) and Demography (1.9k citations). Authors at German Centre of Gerontology collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Psychology and Aging, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, European Journal of Ageing, Psychology and Health and Innovation in Aging. Some of German Centre of Gerontology's most productive authors include Clemens Tesch‐Römer, Susanne Wurm, Oliver Huxhold, Benjamin Schüz, Wolfgang Schmidt, Jochen P. Ziegelmann, Liat Ayalon, Julia K. Wolff, Norbert Schwarz and Lisa M. Warner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact