Detroit Receiving Hospital

1.3k papers receiving 54.1k citations

Peers

Detroit Receiving Hospital
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1.4k
  • Pharmacology 6.5k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.9k
  • Infectious Diseases 6.8k
  • Molecular Medicine 2k
Replace Harper University Hospital with:
Harper University Hospital United States
St. John Hospital & Medical Center United States
UPMC Presbyterian United States
Erie County Medical Center United States
Lexington VA Health Care System United States
Grady Memorial Hospital United States
VA Western New York Healthcare System United States
University of North Carolina Hospitals United States
Buffalo VA Medical Center United States
Cleveland Clinic Akron General United States
Detroit Receiving Hospital relative to Harper University Hospital United States Harper University Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Harper University Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Detroit Receiving Hospital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Detroit Receiving Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Detroit Receiving Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detroit Receiving Hospital more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Detroit Receiving Hospital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Detroit Receiving Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Detroit Receiving Hospital at the time of their publication.

About Detroit Receiving Hospital

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Detroit Receiving Hospital have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 54.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 66 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 90 papers in Emergency Medicine, 20 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 49 papers in Molecular Medicine and 109 papers in Pharmacology on the topics of Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (98 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (90 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (49 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (46 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (46 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (38 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (36 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (1.4k citations), Pharmacology (6.5k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (1.9k citations), Infectious Diseases (6.8k citations) and Molecular Medicine (2k citations). Authors at Detroit Receiving Hospital collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, Annals of Emergency Medicine, American Journal of Clinical Pathology and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. Some of Detroit Receiving Hospital's most productive authors include Michael Joseph Rybak, Bennie Zak, Donald P. Levine, Albert J. Boyle, Albert Zlatkis, Margaret Campbell, Robert F. Wilson, Richard A. Santucci, James A. Kruse and John Stirling Meyer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact