United States Department of Justice
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child Abuse and Trauma
Papers in
- Health 198
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 90
-
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 350
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 304
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 89
- Top scholars
- Russell W. PittmanSarah E. UllmanConstance E. HelfatRuth S. RaubitschekGregory J. WerdenBen B. BrownRichard TewksburyChristopher Wildeman
- Journals
- Journal of Criminal Justice (66 papers)Review of Industrial Organization (34 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (30 papers)Journal of Offender Rehabilitation (26 papers)American Journal of Criminal Justice (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
United States Department of Justice
1.7k papers receiving 32.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Health 4.3k
- Clinical Psychology 6.9k
- Sociology and Political Science 14.8k
- Gender Studies 2.8k
- Strategy and Management 3.4k
Countries citing scholars working at United States Department of Justice
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Department of Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Department of Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Department of Justice more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United States Department of Justice
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Department of Justice at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Department of Justice at the time of their publication.
About United States Department of Justice
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Department of Justice have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 36.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 198 papers in Health, 823 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 302 papers in Clinical Psychology, 125 papers in Gender Studies and 298 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (350 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (304 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (138 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (123 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (122 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (102 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (90 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (89 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (4.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (6.9k citations), Sociology and Political Science (14.8k citations), Gender Studies (2.8k citations) and Strategy and Management (3.4k citations). Authors at United States Department of Justice collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Criminal Justice, Review of Industrial Organization, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation and American Journal of Criminal Justice. Some of United States Department of Justice's most productive authors include Russell W. Pittman, Sarah E. Ullman, Constance E. Helfat, Ruth S. Raubitschek, Gregory J. Werden, Ben B. Brown, Richard Tewksbury, Christopher Wildeman, Jon M. Shane and Emily A. Wang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.