Dundalk Institute of Technology

923 papers receiving 17.9k citations

Peers

Dundalk Institute of Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.8k
  • Business and International Management 450
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 250
  • Environmental Chemistry 1.4k
  • Oceanography 1.5k
Replace Liverpool College with:
Liverpool College United Kingdom
ET Enterprises (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Science Foundation Ireland Ireland
Bühler (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institute of Technology Sligo Ireland
Southampton Solent University United Kingdom
Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology Ireland
Shannon Applied Biotechnology Centre Ireland
Buckinghamshire New University United Kingdom
Improvement Service United Kingdom
Dundalk Institute of Technology relative to Liverpool College United Kingdom Liverpool College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.8×
Liverpool College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Dundalk Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Dundalk Institute of Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Dundalk Institute of Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dundalk Institute of Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Dundalk Institute of Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Dundalk Institute of Technology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Dundalk Institute of Technology at the time of their publication.

About Dundalk Institute of Technology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Dundalk Institute of Technology have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 20.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 68 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology, 39 papers in Software, 72 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 33 papers in Sensory Systems and 149 papers in Information Systems on the topics of Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (123 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (68 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (48 papers), Software Engineering Research (46 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (40 papers), Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy (39 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (38 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (1.8k citations), Business and International Management (450 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (250 citations), Environmental Chemistry (1.4k citations) and Oceanography (1.5k citations). Authors at Dundalk Institute of Technology collaborate with scholars in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, Energies, Electrochimica Acta and Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. Some of Dundalk Institute of Technology's most productive authors include Colette Henry, Moira Maguire, Brid Delahunt, Fergal McCaffery, Gerry Coleman, Claire Leitch, R. Iestyn Woolway, Rory V. O’Connor, Frances Hill and Eleanor Jennings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact