Institute of Technology Management

1.7k papers receiving 21.6k citations

Peers

Institute of Technology Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
  • Information Systems and Management 1.5k
  • Marketing 1.7k
  • Health Informatics 218
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.4k
  • Business and International Management 225
Replace Jaypee Institute of Information Technology with:
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology India
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University India
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur India
Indian Institute of Management Rohtak India
Superior University Pakistan
University of Central Punjab Pakistan
Air University Pakistan
Netaji Subhas University of Technology India
Punjab Technical University India
The NorthCap University India
Institute of Technology Management relative to Jaypee Institute of Information Technology India Jaypee Institute of Information Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Technology Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Technology Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Technology Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Technology Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Technology Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Technology Management at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Technology Management at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Technology Management

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Technology Management have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 22.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 181 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 17 papers in Business and International Management, 49 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 74 papers in Management Information Systems and 434 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Biodiesel Production and Applications (54 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (48 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (46 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (46 papers), Optimal Power Flow Distribution (42 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (42 papers), Power System Optimization and Stability (40 papers) and Antenna Design and Analysis (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Information Systems and Management (1.5k citations), Marketing (1.7k citations), Health Informatics (218 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.4k citations) and Business and International Management (225 citations). Authors at Institute of Technology Management collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Saudi Arabia and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Access, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Materials Today Proceedings, Materials Research Express and Scientific Reports. Some of Institute of Technology Management's most productive authors include Rakhi Thakur, Akash Saxena, Sumeet Gupta, Hee‐Woong Kim, Mala Srivastava, Pankaj Dadheech, Vikrant P. Katekar, Sandip Deshmukh, Oliver Gassmann and Basant Agarwal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact