Statistics Denmark

34.4k citations
824 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Statistics Denmark

670 papers receiving 27.5k citations

Peers

Statistics Denmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Statistics and Probability 3.6k
  • Emergency Medical Services 2.0k
  • Finance 2.6k
  • Oral Surgery 843
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.2k
Replace Mercer (Czechia) with:
Mercer (Czechia) Czechia
Statistisches Bundesamt Germany
Risk Management Solutions (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Mathématiques Appliquées à Paris 5 France
John Deere (Germany) Germany
Swiss National Science Foundation Switzerland
The Geneva Association Switzerland
Royal Statistical Society United Kingdom
Union Bank of Switzerland Switzerland
Emerson (Sweden) Sweden
Statistics Denmark relative to Mercer (Czechia) Czechia Mercer (Czechia)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40.1×
Mercer (Czechia) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Statistics Denmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Statistics Denmark. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Statistics Denmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistics Denmark more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Statistics Denmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Statistics Denmark at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Statistics Denmark at the time of their publication.

About Statistics Denmark

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Statistics Denmark have published 824 papers, which have received a total of 34.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Statistics and Probability, 24 papers in Health, 16 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13 papers in Speech and Hearing and 27 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis on the topics of Statistical Methods and Inference (26 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (21 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (17 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (16 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (16 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (14 papers), Global Health Care Issues (13 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics and Probability (3.6k citations), Emergency Medical Services (2.0k citations), Finance (2.6k citations), Oral Surgery (843 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.2k citations). Authors at Statistics Denmark collaborate with scholars in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Statistics in Medicine, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Scientific Reports, Probability Theory and Related Fields and PLoS ONE. Some of Statistics Denmark's most productive authors include Per Kragh Andersen, Holger Rootzén, M. R. Leadbetter, Georg Lindgren, Søren Johansen, Niels Keiding, Ørnulf Borgan, Richard D. Gill, Mikkel Baadsgaard and Jens Ove Andreasen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact