Centre for the Study of Developing Societies
Impact in
- Development top 10%
- International Development and Aid
-
- Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Papers in
-
- Global trade and economics 54
- Development 22
- International Development and Aid 21
- Top scholars
- Ravi SundaramNagesh KumarAshis NandyKarthik MuralidharanMichael KremerJeffrey S. HammerFrances RogersNazmul Chaudhury
- Journals
- Alternatives Global Local Political (17 papers)Studies in Indian Politics (14 papers)Contributions to Indian Sociology (9 papers)The Indian Economic & Social History Review (4 papers)South Asia Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Centre for the Study of Developing Societies
293 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
- Development 203
- Safety Research 377
- Business and International Management 87
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 354
- Political Science and International Relations 763
Countries citing scholars working at Centre for the Study of Developing Societies
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre for the Study of Developing Societies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre for the Study of Developing Societies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre for the Study of Developing Societies more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre for the Study of Developing Societies
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre for the Study of Developing Societies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre for the Study of Developing Societies at the time of their publication.
About Centre for the Study of Developing Societies
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre for the Study of Developing Societies have published 411 papers, which have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 66 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 22 papers in Development, 24 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, 112 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 90 papers in Economics and Econometrics on the topics of Global trade and economics (54 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (35 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (32 papers), South Asian Cinema and Culture (24 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (23 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (21 papers), International Development and Aid (21 papers) and Indian History and Philosophy (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Development (203 citations), Safety Research (377 citations), Business and International Management (87 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (354 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (763 citations). Authors at Centre for the Study of Developing Societies collaborate with scholars in India, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Alternatives Global Local Political, Studies in Indian Politics, Contributions to Indian Sociology, The Indian Economic & Social History Review and South Asia Research. Some of Centre for the Study of Developing Societies's most productive authors include Ravi Sundaram, Nagesh Kumar, Ashis Nandy, Karthik Muralidharan, Michael Kremer, Jeffrey S. Hammer, Frances Rogers, Nazmul Chaudhury, Prabir De and Sarada Balagopalan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.