Embrapa Amapá

5.6k citations
456 papers ·

Impact in

    • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
    • Aquaculture disease management and microbiota

Papers in

    • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions 152
    • Environmental and biological studies 20
    • Insect behavior and control techniques 57

Embrapa Amapá

420 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

Embrapa Amapá
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Ecology 1.7k
  • Immunology 1k
  • Aquatic Science 357
  • Insect Science 462
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 350
Replace Universidade Estadual do Amapá with:
Universidade Estadual do Amapá Brazil
Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá Brazil
Embrapa Roraima Brazil
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá Brazil
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril Brazil
Universidade Estadual da Região Tocantina do Maranhão Brazil
Embrapa Goats and Sheep Brazil
Universidade do Tocantins Brazil
Embrapa Agroenergia Brazil
Instituto Federal do Amapá Brazil
Embrapa Amapá relative to Universidade Estadual do Amapá Brazil Universidade Estadual do Amapá's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Universidade Estadual do Amapá · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Embrapa Amapá

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Embrapa Amapá. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Embrapa Amapá with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Embrapa Amapá more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Embrapa Amapá

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Embrapa Amapá at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Embrapa Amapá at the time of their publication.

About Embrapa Amapá

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Embrapa Amapá have published 456 papers, which have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 188 papers in Ecology, 67 papers in Insect Science, 15 papers in Forestry, 25 papers in Aquatic Science and 34 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (152 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (62 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (57 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (27 papers), Environmental and biological studies (20 papers), Helminth infection and control (19 papers), Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (17 papers) and Forest ecology and management (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (1.7k citations), Immunology (1k citations), Aquatic Science (357 citations), Insect Science (462 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (350 citations). Authors at Embrapa Amapá collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária/Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Journal of Fish Diseases and Aquaculture. Some of Embrapa Amapá's most productive authors include Marcos Tavares‐Dias, Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol, Gustavo Spadotti Amaral Castro, Lígia Rigôr Neves, Maurício Laterça Martins, Marcos Sidney Brito Oliveira, Marcelino Carneiro Guedes, Márcia Kelly Reis Dias, Ricardo Adaime and Luis Maurício Abdon da Silva.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact