Instituto Federal do Amapá

1.4k citations
383 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Growth and nutrition in plants 13
    • Genetics and Plant Breeding 12
    • Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications 9
    • Education Pedagogy and Practices 22
    • Science and Education Research 9
    • Rural and Ethnic Education 8

Instituto Federal do Amapá

296 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Instituto Federal do Amapá
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Speech and Hearing 40
  • Plant Science 230
  • Food Science 101
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 54
  • Soil Science 69
Replace Universidade do Tocantins with:
Universidade do Tocantins Brazil
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura Brazil
Instituto Superior de Teologia Aplicada Brazil
Centro Universitário do Norte Brazil
Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho Brazil
Embrapa Rondônia Brazil
Embrapa Coffee Brazil
Instituto Federal do Acre Brazil
Universidade Federal do Norte do Tocantins
Centro Universitário de Mineiros Brazil
Instituto Federal do Amapá relative to Universidade do Tocantins Brazil Universidade do Tocantins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×
Universidade do Tocantins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Instituto Federal do Amapá

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto Federal do Amapá. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto Federal do Amapá with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto Federal do Amapá more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto Federal do Amapá

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto Federal do Amapá at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto Federal do Amapá at the time of their publication.

About Instituto Federal do Amapá

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto Federal do Amapá have published 383 papers, which have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 69 papers in Plant Science, 61 papers in Education, 12 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 14 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 13 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Education Pedagogy and Practices (22 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (13 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (12 papers), Forest ecology and management (10 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (9 papers), Science and Education Research (9 papers), Rural and Ethnic Education (8 papers) and Education and Public Policy (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Speech and Hearing (40 citations), Plant Science (230 citations), Food Science (101 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (54 citations) and Soil Science (69 citations). Authors at Instituto Federal do Amapá collaborate with scholars in Brazil, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Small Ruminant Research, Scientific Reports, Ceramics International, Environmental Science and Pollution Research and Livestock Science. Some of Instituto Federal do Amapá's most productive authors include Vânia Caldas de Sousa, Dais Gonçalves Rocha, Júlia Aparecida Devidé Nogueira, Fabiano Severo Rodembusch, Nilson S. Ferreira, Cláudio Alberto Gellis de Mattos Dias, Euzébio de Oliveira, Amanda Alves Fecury, Osvaldo Resende and Carla Viana Dendasck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact