Committee on Publication Ethics

1.1k papers receiving 22.0k citations

Peers

Committee on Publication Ethics
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 319
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 547
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 778
  • Emergency Medicine 1.2k
  • Surgery 6.0k
Replace MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit with:
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit United Kingdom
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board United Kingdom
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital United Kingdom
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
St Michaels Hospital United Kingdom
University Hospital Llandough United Kingdom
Bradford Royal Infirmary United Kingdom
Glanrhyd Hospital United Kingdom
Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands) Netherlands
Selly Oak Hospital United Kingdom
Committee on Publication Ethics relative to MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit United Kingdom MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Committee on Publication Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Committee on Publication Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Committee on Publication Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Committee on Publication Ethics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Committee on Publication Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Committee on Publication Ethics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Committee on Publication Ethics at the time of their publication.

About Committee on Publication Ethics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Committee on Publication Ethics have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 27.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7 papers in Research and Theory, 9 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 137 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 192 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 58 papers in Emergency Medicine on the topics of Ethics in medical practice (50 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (43 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (40 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (37 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (32 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (27 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (24 papers) and Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Medical Laboratory Technology (319 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (547 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (778 citations), Emergency Medicine (1.2k citations) and Surgery (6.0k citations). Authors at Committee on Publication Ethics collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Psychosomatic Medicine, Nurse Educator and Cornea. Some of Committee on Publication Ethics's most productive authors include Sue M. Hignett, Lynn McAtamney, Timothy A. Salthouse, Rod J. Rohrich, Irene Hurst, Lynn Clark Callister, Mitzi Davis, Ingemar Davidson, Paul Robert McCrory and Joshua A. Grant.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact