Botanical Research Institute of Texas
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 84
- Plant and animal studies 70
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology 35
- Plant Science 147
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 36
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 28
- Top scholars
- Frank L. LewisMathias W. ToblerGeorge V. N. PowellSamia E. Carrillo‐PercasteguiAli DavoudiJosep M. GuerreroAli BidramPark S. Nobel
- Journals
- Phytotaxa (24 papers)Mycologia (17 papers)American Journal of Botany (14 papers)Taxon (8 papers)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilChina
In The Last Decade
Botanical Research Institute of Texas
314 papers receiving 7.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
- Ecological Modeling 709
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 930
- Ecology 1.8k
- Plant Science 1.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Botanical Research Institute of Texas
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Botanical Research Institute of Texas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Botanical Research Institute of Texas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Botanical Research Institute of Texas more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Botanical Research Institute of Texas
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Botanical Research Institute of Texas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Botanical Research Institute of Texas at the time of their publication.
About Botanical Research Institute of Texas
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Botanical Research Institute of Texas have published 374 papers, which have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 169 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 147 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in Ecological Modeling, 37 papers in Cell Biology and 22 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (84 papers), Plant and animal studies (70 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (53 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (36 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (36 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (35 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (28 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (709 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (930 citations), Ecology (1.8k citations) and Plant Science (1.7k citations). Authors at Botanical Research Institute of Texas collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and China and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Mycologia, American Journal of Botany, Taxon and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. Some of Botanical Research Institute of Texas's most productive authors include Frank L. Lewis, Mathias W. Tobler, George V. N. Powell, Samia E. Carrillo‐Percastegui, Ali Davoudi, Josep M. Guerrero, Ali Bidram, Park S. Nobel, Norma J. Lang and Renata Leite Pitman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.