El Colegio de México

18.5k citations
3.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

El Colegio de México

2.9k papers receiving 18.4k citations

Peers

El Colegio de México
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Demography 1.7k
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 918
  • Urban Studies 696
  • Sociology and Political Science 4.7k
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.5k
Replace Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas with:
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas Mexico
Universidad Iberoamericana Mexico
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública Mexico
Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi United States
Sam Houston State University United States
University of Houston - Clear Lake United States
Prairie View A&M University United States
Loyola University New Orleans United States
University of Houston - Downtown United States
The University of Texas at Tyler United States
El Colegio de México relative to Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas Mexico Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at El Colegio de México

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at El Colegio de México. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at El Colegio de México with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites El Colegio de México more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at El Colegio de México

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with El Colegio de México at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with El Colegio de México at the time of their publication.

About El Colegio de México

In recent decades, authors affiliated with El Colegio de México have published 3.7k papers, which have received a total of 18.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 680 papers in Demography, 164 papers in Urban Studies, 981 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 638 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 184 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts on the topics of Historical Studies in Latin America (425 papers), Latin American history and culture (170 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (156 papers), Latin American Urban Studies (131 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (123 papers), Political Dynamics in Latin America (105 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (103 papers) and Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (99 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Demography (1.7k citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (918 citations), Urban Studies (696 citations), Sociology and Political Science (4.7k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (2.5k citations). Authors at El Colegio de México collaborate with scholars in Mexico, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Historia Mexicana, Hispanic American Historical Review, América Latina en la Historia Económica, World Development and Estudios de Asia y África. Some of El Colegio de México's most productive authors include Raymundo M. Campos-Vázquez, Antonio Yúnez–Naude, Gerardo Esquivel, Rodolfo Stavenhagen, Carlos M. Urzúa, Brígida García, J. Edward Taylor, Fatima Juárez, Orlandina de Oliveira and Kirsten Albrechtsen de Appendini.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact