National Research Council

1.6M citations
59.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Climate variability and models 626
    • Marine and fisheries research 607
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 606
    • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols 791
    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations 635
    • Cryospheric studies and observations 622

National Research Council

54.1k papers receiving 1.5M citations

Peers

National Research Council
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Global and Planetary Change 97.1k
  • Atmospheric Science 78.0k
  • Biomaterials 54.6k
  • Pollution 47.7k
  • Molecular Biology 271.8k
Replace Sapienza University of Rome with:
Sapienza University of Rome Italy
University of Florence Italy
University of Bologna Italy
University of Naples Federico II Italy
University of Padua Italy
University of Pisa Italy
University of Perugia Italy
University of Milan Italy
Universität Innsbruck Austria
University of Genoa Italy
National Research Council relative to Sapienza University of Rome Italy Sapienza University of Rome's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sapienza University of Rome · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Research Council

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Research Council. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Research Council with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Research Council more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Research Council

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Research Council at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Research Council at the time of their publication.

About National Research Council

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Research Council have published 59.2k papers, which have received a total of 1.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.1k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 3.3k papers in Atmospheric Science, 1.2k papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 2.2k papers in Environmental Engineering and 1.8k papers in Oceanography on the topics of Landslides and related hazards (835 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (791 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (653 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (635 papers), Climate variability and models (626 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (622 papers), Marine and fisheries research (607 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (606 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (97.1k citations), Atmospheric Science (78.0k citations), Biomaterials (54.6k citations), Pollution (47.7k citations) and Molecular Biology (271.8k citations). Authors at National Research Council collaborate with scholars in Italy, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Remote Sensing and Sensors. Some of National Research Council's most productive authors include Mario Coccia, Vincenzo Di Marzo, Enrico Drioli, Rita Levi‐Montalcini, Luigi Zecca, Gian Luigi Russo, Mario A. Gomarasca, Luigi Ambrosio, Daniele Archibugi and Luca Brocca.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact