China National Institute of Standardization

11.8k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

China National Institute of Standardization

949 papers receiving 11.8k citations

Peers

China National Institute of Standardization
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Biotechnology 413
  • Pollution 624
  • Food Science 956
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 795
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 118
Replace Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research with:
Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research China
Beijing Polytechnic China
Weifang University of Science and Technology China
Huanghe Science and Technology College China
West Anhui University China
Shangdong Agriculture and Engineering University China
Longdong University China
Yulin University China
Shandong Polytechnic China
Huanghuai University China
China National Institute of Standardization relative to Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research China Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at China National Institute of Standardization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at China National Institute of Standardization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at China National Institute of Standardization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China National Institute of Standardization more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at China National Institute of Standardization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with China National Institute of Standardization at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with China National Institute of Standardization at the time of their publication.

About China National Institute of Standardization

In recent decades, authors affiliated with China National Institute of Standardization have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 11.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 18 papers in Ecological Modeling, 124 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Business and International Management and 12 papers in Energy Engineering and Power Technology on the topics of Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (92 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (33 papers), Quality and Management Systems (32 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (23 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (21 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (21 papers), Topic Modeling (20 papers) and Evaluation and Optimization Models (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biotechnology (413 citations), Pollution (624 citations), Food Science (956 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (795 citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (118 citations). Authors at China National Institute of Standardization collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Hong Kong and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Sciences, Sustainability, Food Chemistry, Journal of Cleaner Production and Scientific Reports. Some of China National Institute of Standardization's most productive authors include Tao Lan, Shengpu Gao, Yacine Hémar, Muthupandian Ashokkumar, Gillian D. Lewis, Bolin Shi, Qiao Chu, Zhen Ni Du, Yongcai Zhang and Ming Zhang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact