Capital Meeting Planning

221 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Capital Meeting Planning
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 591
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 473
  • Transportation 143
  • Research and Theory 16
  • Hepatology 134
Replace Clinton Foundation with:
Clinton Foundation United States
Urology of Virginia United States
Rex Hospital United States
SRA International (United States) United States
Bon Secours Health System United States
Wilson Community College United States
Jacobson Holman (United States) United States
Avalon Pharma (United States) United States
Office of Inspector General United States
Easton Hospital United States
Capital Meeting Planning relative to Clinton Foundation United States Clinton Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Clinton Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Capital Meeting Planning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Capital Meeting Planning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Capital Meeting Planning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Capital Meeting Planning more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Capital Meeting Planning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Capital Meeting Planning at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Capital Meeting Planning at the time of their publication.

About Capital Meeting Planning

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Capital Meeting Planning have published 260 papers, which have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1 paper in Computational Mathematics, 1 paper in Chemical Health and Safety, 1 paper in Research and Theory, 12 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 4 papers in Health Information Management on the topics of Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (6 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (591 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (473 citations), Transportation (143 citations), Research and Theory (16 citations) and Hepatology (134 citations). Authors at Capital Meeting Planning collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Taxon, Proceedings of the IEEE, System Dynamics Review, Journal of Chromatography A and Neuropsychopharmacology. Some of Capital Meeting Planning's most productive authors include David G. Daniel, Christopher Tietze, Wilhelm Burger, Mark J. Burge, Maurice Y. Nahabedian, Dianne S. Ward, Anne B. Rodgers, Richard P. Troiano, Amber Vaughn and Kelly R. Evenson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact