Chicago Zoological Society

37.0k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

    • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Ecology top 5%
    • Marine animal studies overview
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

Papers in

Chicago Zoological Society

1.0k papers receiving 36.2k citations

Peers

Chicago Zoological Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Developmental Biology 5.2k
  • Ecology 17.3k
  • Small Animals 3.9k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 7.5k
  • Social Psychology 7.8k
Replace Lincoln Park Zoo with:
Lincoln Park Zoo United States
National Wildlife Health Center United States
Life Services (United States) United States
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources United States
Carnegie Museum of Natural History United States
Saint Louis Zoo United States
Toronto Zoo Canada
North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences United States
Cornell Lab of Ornithology United States
Missouri Department of Conservation United States
Chicago Zoological Society relative to Lincoln Park Zoo United States Lincoln Park Zoo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Lincoln Park Zoo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Chicago Zoological Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chicago Zoological Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chicago Zoological Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chicago Zoological Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Chicago Zoological Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chicago Zoological Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chicago Zoological Society at the time of their publication.

About Chicago Zoological Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chicago Zoological Society have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 37.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 105 papers in Developmental Biology, 165 papers in Small Animals, 478 papers in Ecology, 19 papers in Equine and 118 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Marine animal studies overview (285 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (136 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (112 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (105 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (105 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (83 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (67 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (66 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (5.2k citations), Ecology (17.3k citations), Small Animals (3.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (7.5k citations) and Social Psychology (7.8k citations). Authors at Chicago Zoological Society collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Zoo Biology, Marine Mammal Science, PLoS ONE, Journal of Wildlife Diseases and American Journal of Primatology. Some of Chicago Zoological Society's most productive authors include Robert C. Lacy, Jeanne Altmann, Randall S. Wells, Susan C. Alberts, Joan B. Silk, Ben Beck, Jonathan D. Ballou, Nadja Wielebnowski, Laela S. Sayigh and Richard Frankham.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact