Central Institute of Mental Health

332.4k citations
8.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Central Institute of Mental Health

8.2k papers receiving 332.3k citations

Peers

Central Institute of Mental Health
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 78.5k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 9.8k
  • Biological Psychiatry 3.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49.7k
  • Clinical Psychology 47.4k
Replace Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim with:
Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Netherlands
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry Germany
Amsterdam Neuroscience Netherlands
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Italy
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Germany
Amsterdam Public Health Netherlands
Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli Italy
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich Switzerland
Fondazione Santa Lucia Italy
Central Institute of Mental Health relative to Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Central Institute of Mental Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Central Institute of Mental Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Central Institute of Mental Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Institute of Mental Health more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Central Institute of Mental Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Central Institute of Mental Health at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Central Institute of Mental Health at the time of their publication.

About Central Institute of Mental Health

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Central Institute of Mental Health have published 8.6k papers, which have received a total of 332.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.4k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 271 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 1.4k papers in Clinical Psychology, 1.3k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 811 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (1.1k papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (628 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (531 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (420 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (378 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (325 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (302 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (294 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (78.5k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (9.8k citations), Biological Psychiatry (3.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (49.7k citations) and Clinical Psychology (47.4k citations). Authors at Central Institute of Mental Health collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Pharmacopsychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and PLoS ONE. Some of Central Institute of Mental Health's most productive authors include Herta Flor, Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg, Rainer Spanagel, Michael Schredl, Heinz Häfner, Christine Kuehner, Karl F Mann, Christian G. Schmahl, Martin Bohus and Peter Kirsch.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact