Central Institute for Arid Horticulture
Impact in
-
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
-
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Food and Agricultural Sciences
Papers in
- Forestry 20
- African Botany and Ecology Studies 19
- Plant Science 189
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 44
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 40
- Agricultural Practices and Plant Genetics 25
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 22
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 20
- Top scholars
- Dhurendra SinghHare KrishnaMukesh Kumar BerwalShravan Manbhar HaldharManoj KumarM. AlizadehMaliheh EftekhariVarsha Satankar
- Journals
- BMC Plant Biology (12 papers)Scientific Reports (11 papers)Horticulturae (7 papers)Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution (6 papers)Plants (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesIran
In The Last Decade
Central Institute for Arid Horticulture
268 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Plant Science 1.7k
- Food Science 669
- Forestry 130
- Biochemistry 172
- Insect Science 210
Countries citing scholars working at Central Institute for Arid Horticulture
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Central Institute for Arid Horticulture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Central Institute for Arid Horticulture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Institute for Arid Horticulture more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Central Institute for Arid Horticulture
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Central Institute for Arid Horticulture at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Central Institute for Arid Horticulture at the time of their publication.
About Central Institute for Arid Horticulture
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Central Institute for Arid Horticulture have published 308 papers, which have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 20 papers in Forestry, 189 papers in Plant Science, 2 papers in Horticulture, 25 papers in Insect Science and 30 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Genetics and Plant Breeding (44 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (40 papers), Agricultural Practices and Plant Genetics (25 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (22 papers), Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (21 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (20 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (19 papers) and Agricultural Science and Fertilization (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (1.7k citations), Food Science (669 citations), Forestry (130 citations), Biochemistry (172 citations) and Insect Science (210 citations). Authors at Central Institute for Arid Horticulture collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Iran and have published in prestigious journals including BMC Plant Biology, Scientific Reports, Horticulturae, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution and Plants. Some of Central Institute for Arid Horticulture's most productive authors include Dhurendra Singh, Hare Krishna, Mukesh Kumar Berwal, Shravan Manbhar Haldhar, Manoj Kumar, M. Alizadeh, Maliheh Eftekhari, Varsha Satankar, Ryszard Amarowicz and Maharishi Tomar.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.