Child and Family Research Institute
Impact in
-
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Papers in
-
- Infant Development and Preterm Care 60
-
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 103
- Top scholars
- Sheila Margaret InnisMichael R. HaydenRUTH ECKSTEIN GRUNAUPeter C. K. LeungBruce Perrin LanphearMichael Steffen KoborStuart E. TurveyTim F. Oberlander
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (74 papers)Clinical Genetics (40 papers)Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (40 papers)The Journal of Immunology (32 papers)PEDIATRICS (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Child and Family Research Institute
2.5k papers receiving 144.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 12.9k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 6.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 9k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 1.6k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 6.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Child and Family Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Child and Family Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Child and Family Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child and Family Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Child and Family Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Child and Family Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Child and Family Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Child and Family Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Child and Family Research Institute have published 2.5k papers, which have received a total of 144.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 249 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 146 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 152 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 173 papers in Immunology and 241 papers in Genetics on the topics of Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (123 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (103 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (73 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (71 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (65 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (60 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (55 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (54 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (12.9k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (6.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (9k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (1.6k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (6.4k citations). Authors at Child and Family Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Clinical Genetics, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, The Journal of Immunology and PEDIATRICS. Some of Child and Family Research Institute's most productive authors include Sheila Margaret Innis, Michael R. Hayden, RUTH ECKSTEIN GRUNAU, Peter C. K. Leung, Bruce Perrin Lanphear, Michael Steffen Kobor, Stuart E. Turvey, Tim F. Oberlander, Liam R. Brunham and Geoffrey L. Hammond.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.