Child and Family Research Institute

131.8k citations
2.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Child and Family Research Institute

2.1k papers receiving 110.2k citations

Peers

Child and Family Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 17.6k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 5.5k
  • Molecular Biology 37.6k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Immunology 10.1k
Replace Women's Health Research Institute with:
Women's Health Research Institute Canada
Portland VA Medical Center United States
Discovery Institute United States
Children's Center United States
Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia Canada
Vancouver Coastal Health Canada
Public Health Institute United States
California Pacific Medical Center United States
Reproductive Science Center United States
Hotchkiss Brain Institute Canada
Child and Family Research Institute relative to Women's Health Research Institute Canada Women's Health Research Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Women's Health Research Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Child and Family Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Child and Family Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Child and Family Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child and Family Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Child and Family Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Child and Family Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Child and Family Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Child and Family Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Child and Family Research Institute have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 131.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 330 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 100 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202 papers in Immunology, 627 papers in Molecular Biology and 250 papers in Genetics on the topics of Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (117 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (84 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (79 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (77 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (74 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (64 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (60 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (57 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (17.6k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (5.5k citations), Molecular Biology (37.6k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (1.8k citations) and Immunology (10.1k citations). Authors at Child and Family Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, The Journal of Immunology, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, PEDIATRICS and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. Some of Child and Family Research Institute's most productive authors include Sheila M. Innis, Michael R. Hayden, Ruth E. Grunau, Peter C. K. Leung, Michael S. Kobor, Bruce P. Lanphear, Tim F. Oberlander, Stuart E. Turvey, Liam R. Brunham and Geoffrey L. Hammond.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact