Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

12.3k citations
428 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

362 papers receiving 11.0k citations

Peers

Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2.1k
  • Rheumatology 2.0k
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.1k
  • Oncology 2.3k
  • Hematology 594
Replace Cochrane with:
Cochrane Brazil
Centro de Pesquisas Oncológicas Brazil
Medecell (Brazil) Brazil
Hospital Felício Rocho Brazil
Fundação Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia de Minas Gerais Brazil
Centro Universitário Lusíada Brazil
Instituto de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Metabólicas Argentina
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo Brazil
Hospital Provincial de Rosario Argentina
Universidad Hospital Italiano Argentina
Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica relative to Cochrane Brazil Cochrane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21.3×
Cochrane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica at the time of their publication.

About Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica have published 428 papers, which have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 45 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 30 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 32 papers in Rheumatology, 50 papers in Oncology and 52 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Bone health and osteoporosis research (30 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (29 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (26 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (25 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (15 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (15 papers), Bone health and treatments (12 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (2.1k citations), Rheumatology (2.0k citations), Reproductive Medicine (1.1k citations), Oncology (2.3k citations) and Hematology (594 citations). Authors at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Archives of Osteoporosis, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and Osteoporosis International. Some of Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica's most productive authors include Cristiano A. F. Zerbini, Brant Liebmann, Felicia Cosman, J.B.A. Oliveira, Edith M. C. Lau, Claudia Guilhermino Petersen, José Gonçalves Franco Jr, Laura Diniz Vagnini, Ana Lucia Mauri and Cesar R. Libanati.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact