Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

12.5k citations
553 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

447 papers receiving 11.1k citations

Peers

Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1.9k
  • Rheumatology 1.8k
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.0k
  • Oncology 2.1k
  • Hematology 547
Replace Microsoft (Brazil) with:
Microsoft (Brazil) Brazil
Faculdade Evangélica do Paraná Brazil
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria Brazil
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões Brazil
Hospital Central da Polícia Militar Brazil
Hospital Madre Teresa Brazil
Universidade Estadual da Zona Oeste Brazil
Fundação Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia de Minas Gerais Brazil
Brazilian Academy of Sciences Brazil
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia Brazil
Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica relative to Microsoft (Brazil) Brazil Microsoft (Brazil)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.9×
Microsoft (Brazil) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica at the time of their publication.

About Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica have published 553 papers, which have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 48 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 32 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 36 papers in Rheumatology, 67 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 56 papers in Oncology on the topics of Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (32 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (30 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (29 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (25 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (16 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (15 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (13 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.9k citations), Rheumatology (1.8k citations), Reproductive Medicine (1.0k citations), Oncology (2.1k citations) and Hematology (547 citations). Authors at Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Archives of Osteoporosis and Osteoporosis International. Some of Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica's most productive authors include Cristiano A. F. Zerbini, Brant Liebmann, José A. Marengo, Felicia Cosman, Edith Lau, J.B.A. Oliveira, Cláudia G. Petersen, Javier Tomasella, J.G. Franco and M. G. Hodnett.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact