Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo

4.4k citations
588 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo

424 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 366
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 482
  • Pollution 224
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 229
  • Internal Medicine 50
Replace Hospital Madre Teresa with:
Hospital Madre Teresa Brazil
Brazilian Academy of Sciences Brazil
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões Brazil
Centro Universitário Newton Paiva Brazil
Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos Brazil
Universidade Estadual da Zona Oeste Brazil
Fundação do ABC Brazil
Microsoft (Brazil) Brazil
Prefeitura Municipal de Belo Horizonte Brazil
Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Santa Casa Brazil
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo relative to Hospital Madre Teresa Brazil Hospital Madre Teresa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Hospital Madre Teresa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo at the time of their publication.

About Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo have published 588 papers, which have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 56 papers in Law, 16 papers in Forestry, 40 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 17 papers in Urban Studies and 16 papers in Information Systems and Management on the topics of Brazilian Legal Issues (52 papers), Social and Political Issues (22 papers), Rural Development and Agriculture (21 papers), Public Health in Brazil (20 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (19 papers), Business and Management Studies (16 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (15 papers) and Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (366 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (482 citations), Pollution (224 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (229 citations) and Internal Medicine (50 citations). Authors at Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Densitometry, Jornal de Pediatria, Zootaxa and Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. Some of Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo's most productive authors include Sergio Ragi-Eis, Isaac R. Santos, D. J. Hosking, Julie Chandler, Juliana A. Ivar do Sul, Kurt Lippuner, Josephine M. Norquist, Paul Lips, Ghassan Maalouf and Lois E. Wehren.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact