Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
Impact in
-
- Politics and Society in Latin America
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Law top 5%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Papers in
-
- Social Sciences and Policies 71
-
- Public Policy and Governance 117
- Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies 115
- Political Dynamics in Latin America 105
- International Relations in Latin America 76
- Top scholars
- David ReherGabriel L. NegrettoSandra León AlfonsoMaríaCaterina La BarberaAnne Mariel PetersJosé Antonio López SáezAdriana BasileRosa Castaldo Cobianchi
In The Last Decade
Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
1.1k papers receiving 6.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
- Political Science and International Relations 2.1k
- Law 622
- Demography 613
- Sociology and Political Science 2.3k
- Communication 335
Countries citing scholars working at Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales at the time of their publication.
About Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 77 papers in General Social Sciences, 571 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 144 papers in Law, 163 papers in Demography and 550 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Public Policy and Governance (117 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (115 papers), Political Dynamics in Latin America (105 papers), Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (94 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (92 papers), International Relations in Latin America (76 papers), Latin American socio-political dynamics (73 papers) and Social Sciences and Policies (71 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Political Science and International Relations (2.1k citations), Law (622 citations), Demography (613 citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.3k citations) and Communication (335 citations). Authors at Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales collaborate with scholars in Spain, Mexico and Colombia and have published in prestigious journals including Colombia Internacional, Estudios constitucionales, Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, Revista de Estudios Sociales and Análisis Político. Some of Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales's most productive authors include David Reher, Gabriel L. Negretto, Sandra León Alfonso, MaríaCaterina La Barbera, Anne Mariel Peters, José Antonio López Sáez, Adriana Basile, Rosa Castaldo Cobianchi, Arthur Dyèvre and Érik Neveu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.