Estudios constitucionales

492 papers and 985 indexed citations i.

About

The 492 papers published in Estudios constitucionales in the last decades have received a total of 985 indexed citations. Papers published in Estudios constitucionales usually cover Political Science and International Relations (451 papers), Law (360 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (220 papers) specifically the topics of Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (424 papers), Legal processes and jurisprudence (264 papers) and Human Rights and Immigration (181 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Estudios constitucionales are Humberto Nogueira Alcalá, José I. Martínez, Allan R. Brewer–Carías, Luigi Ferrajoli, F. Ramón Zúñiga, Armin von Bogdandy, César Landa Arroyo, Juarez Freitas, Diego Bustamante and Andrea Castagnola.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Estudios constitucionales

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Estudios constitucionales. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Estudios constitucionales.

Countries where authors publish in Estudios constitucionales

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Estudios constitucionales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Estudios constitucionales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estudios constitucionales more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025