Center for South Asian Studies
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Urban Planning and Governance
-
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
Papers in
- Anthropology 57
- Anthropological Studies and Insights 27
-
- Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender 28
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts 26
- Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies 24
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 23
- Top scholars
- Loraine KennedyVéronique DupontLaurent GayerStéphanie Tawa Lama‐RewalValéry RiddeBertrand LefebvreFrédéric LandyÉric P. Meyer
- Journals
- Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales (13 papers)The Indian Economic & Social History Review (4 papers)Territory Politics Governance (3 papers)Contributions to Indian Sociology (3 papers)Modern Asian Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Center for South Asian Studies
204 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Urban Studies 325
- Anthropology 181
- Political Science and International Relations 442
- Sociology and Political Science 509
- Geography, Planning and Development 51
Countries citing scholars working at Center for South Asian Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for South Asian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for South Asian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for South Asian Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Center for South Asian Studies
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for South Asian Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for South Asian Studies at the time of their publication.
About Center for South Asian Studies
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for South Asian Studies have published 281 papers, which have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Anthropology, 122 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 26 papers in Urban Studies, 21 papers in Religious studies and 115 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (28 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (27 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (26 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (24 papers), African Studies and Ethnography (23 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (23 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (18 papers) and French Urban and Social Studies (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Urban Studies (325 citations), Anthropology (181 citations), Political Science and International Relations (442 citations), Sociology and Political Science (509 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (51 citations). Authors at Center for South Asian Studies collaborate with scholars in France, United States and India and have published in prestigious journals including Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales, The Indian Economic & Social History Review, Territory Politics Governance, Contributions to Indian Sociology and Modern Asian Studies. Some of Center for South Asian Studies's most productive authors include Loraine Kennedy, Véronique Dupont, Laurent Gayer, Stéphanie Tawa Lama‐Rewal, Valéry Ridde, Bertrand Lefebvre, Frédéric Landy, Éric P. Meyer, Charlotte Lemanski and Iñes G. Županov.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.