Center for South Asian Studies
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Anthropology top 10%
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
Papers in
- Anthropology 97
- Anthropological Studies and Insights 38
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 23
-
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts 46
- Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender 44
- Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies 43
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 35
- Islamic Studies and History 25
- Top scholars
- Loraine KennedyStéphanie Tawa Lama‐RewalVéronique DupontLaurent GayerValéry RiddeBertrand LefebvreAlice ThornerFrédéric Landy
- Journals
- Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales (15 papers)The Indian Economic & Social History Review (4 papers)Journal of Early Modern History (3 papers)Territory Politics Governance (3 papers)Modern Asian Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Center for South Asian Studies
298 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Urban Studies 457
- Anthropology 322
- Political Science and International Relations 676
- Sociology and Political Science 781
- Geography, Planning and Development 89
Countries citing scholars working at Center for South Asian Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for South Asian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for South Asian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for South Asian Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Center for South Asian Studies
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for South Asian Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for South Asian Studies at the time of their publication.
About Center for South Asian Studies
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for South Asian Studies have published 412 papers, which have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 97 papers in Anthropology, 182 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 35 papers in Religious studies, 33 papers in Urban Studies and 170 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of South Asian Studies and Conflicts (46 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (44 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (43 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (38 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (35 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (26 papers), Islamic Studies and History (25 papers) and Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Urban Studies (457 citations), Anthropology (322 citations), Political Science and International Relations (676 citations), Sociology and Political Science (781 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (89 citations). Authors at Center for South Asian Studies collaborate with scholars in France, India and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales, The Indian Economic & Social History Review, Journal of Early Modern History, Territory Politics Governance and Modern Asian Studies. Some of Center for South Asian Studies's most productive authors include Loraine Kennedy, Stéphanie Tawa Lama‐Rewal, Véronique Dupont, Laurent Gayer, Valéry Ridde, Bertrand Lefebvre, Alice Thorner, Frédéric Landy, Marie‐Hélène Zérah and Iñes G. Županov.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.