Centro de Estudos Florestais

31.8k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Centro de Estudos Florestais

1.1k papers receiving 31.0k citations

Peers

Centro de Estudos Florestais
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 7.0k
  • Global and Planetary Change 8.3k
  • Ecology 6.6k
  • Ecological Modeling 1.0k
  • Insect Science 2.9k
Replace Institute of Marine Research with:
Institute of Marine Research Portugal
Research Center for Natural Resources, Environment and Society Portugal
Misión Biológica de Galicia Spain
Centro Tecnológico del Mar Spain
Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental Portugal
Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar Portugal
Instituto de Investigacao das Pescas e do Mar Portugal
NEIKER, Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development Spain
Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia Spain
Agrotecnio - Centre for Food and Agriculture Research Spain
Centro de Estudos Florestais relative to Institute of Marine Research Portugal Institute of Marine Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Institute of Marine Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centro de Estudos Florestais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centro de Estudos Florestais. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centro de Estudos Florestais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centro de Estudos Florestais more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centro de Estudos Florestais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centro de Estudos Florestais at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centro de Estudos Florestais at the time of their publication.

About Centro de Estudos Florestais

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centro de Estudos Florestais have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 31.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 270 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 252 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 400 papers in Plant Science, 130 papers in Insect Science and 116 papers in Building and Construction on the topics of Forest ecology and management (161 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (140 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (132 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (112 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (103 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (85 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (82 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (81 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (7.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (8.3k citations), Ecology (6.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.0k citations) and Insect Science (2.9k citations). Authors at Centro de Estudos Florestais collaborate with scholars in Portugal, Spain and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Industrial Crops and Products, Forests, Forest Ecology and Management, Annals of Forest Science and Plants. Some of Centro de Estudos Florestais's most productive authors include Helena Pereira, José Graça, Jorge Gominho, Isabel Miranda, Manuela Branco, Margarida Tomé, María Teresa Ferreira, José Miguel Cardoso Pereira, Ofélia Anjos and Anatoly A. Shatalov.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact