Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
Papers in
- Aging 28
- Top scholars
- Tamàs FülöpJohanne DesrosiersAnis LarbiMélanie LevasseurStephen C. CunnaneIsabelle J. DionnePatrick VermetteAbdelouahed Khalil
- Journals
- Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (29 papers)Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (22 papers)Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism (19 papers)Disability and Rehabilitation (18 papers)Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
1.3k papers receiving 40.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Aging 1.2k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.5k
- Rehabilitation 2.7k
- Physiology 7.2k
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 1.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement at the time of their publication.
About Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 40.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 28 papers in Aging, 59 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 80 papers in Rehabilitation, 69 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and 260 papers in Physiology on the topics of Aging, Health, and Disability (79 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (73 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (68 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (65 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (63 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (61 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (59 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aging (1.2k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.5k citations), Rehabilitation (2.7k citations), Physiology (7.2k citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (1.4k citations). Authors at Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism, Disability and Rehabilitation and Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids. Some of Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement's most productive authors include Tamàs Fülöp, Johanne Desrosiers, Anis Larbi, Mélanie Levasseur, Stephen C. Cunnane, Isabelle J. Dionne, Patrick Vermette, Abdelouahed Khalil, Eric D. B. Goulet and Hélène Payette.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.