Canterbury Christ Church University

81.7k citations
4.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Canterbury Christ Church University

4.2k papers receiving 81.6k citations

Peers

Canterbury Christ Church University
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Conservation 1.8k
  • Clinical Psychology 6k
  • Research and Theory 882
  • Social Psychology 5.3k
  • Education 8.5k
Replace Anglia Ruskin University with:
Anglia Ruskin University United Kingdom
University of Brighton United Kingdom
University of Bedfordshire United Kingdom
De Montfort University United Kingdom
University of East London United Kingdom
University of Derby United Kingdom
London South Bank University United Kingdom
University of Huddersfield United Kingdom
University of Hertfordshire United Kingdom
Edge Hill University United Kingdom
Canterbury Christ Church University relative to Anglia Ruskin University United Kingdom Anglia Ruskin University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Anglia Ruskin University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Canterbury Christ Church University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Canterbury Christ Church University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Canterbury Christ Church University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canterbury Christ Church University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Canterbury Christ Church University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Canterbury Christ Church University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Canterbury Christ Church University at the time of their publication.

About Canterbury Christ Church University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Canterbury Christ Church University have published 4.6k papers, which have received a total of 81.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 95 papers in Research and Theory, 84 papers in Conservation, 570 papers in Education, 312 papers in General Health Professions and 24 papers in Leadership and Management on the topics of Nursing education and management (95 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (85 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (82 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (80 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (61 papers), Religious Education and Schools (61 papers), Radiology practices and education (57 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (57 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Conservation (1.8k citations), Clinical Psychology (6k citations), Research and Theory (882 citations), Social Psychology (5.3k citations) and Education (8.5k citations). Authors at Canterbury Christ Church University collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of Sports Sciences, BMJ Open and Nurse Education Today. Some of Canterbury Christ Church University's most productive authors include Alison M. Smith, Paul M. Camic, Mike Weed, Stephen M. Clift, Adrian Holliday, Fergal W. Jones, David J. Vernon, Stephen Bax, Chris Beedie and Jim Butcher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact