Chinese Academy of Sciences

22.1M citations
729.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Chinese Academy of Sciences

681.9k papers receiving 21.5M citations

Peers

Chinese Academy of Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1.8M
  • Materials Chemistry 4.9M
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.5M
  • Polymers and Plastics 1.1M
  • Catalysis 537.5k
Replace University of Chinese Academy of Sciences with:
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China
Tsinghua University China
Peking University China
Tianjin University China
University of Science and Technology of China China
Nanjing University China
Zhejiang University China
Shandong University China
Dalian University of Technology China
Fudan University China
Chinese Academy of Sciences relative to University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Chinese Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chinese Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chinese Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Academy of Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Chinese Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Chinese Academy of Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chinese Academy of Sciences have published 729.4k papers, which have received a total of 22.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 52.4k papers in Atmospheric Science, 130.1k papers in Materials Chemistry, 50.0k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 42.5k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 33.8k papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment on the topics of Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (14.5k papers), Conducting polymers and applications (14.0k papers), Climate variability and models (13.2k papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (12.9k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (12.9k papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (12.6k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (12.2k papers) and Perovskite Materials and Applications (11.8k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (1.8M citations), Materials Chemistry (4.9M citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.5M citations), Polymers and Plastics (1.1M citations) and Catalysis (537.5k citations). Authors at Chinese Academy of Sciences collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Science of The Total Environment, Remote Sensing, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Scientific Reports and Nature Communications. Some of Chinese Academy of Sciences's most productive authors include Zhong Lin Wang, Lei Jiang, Hui–Ming Cheng, Yongfang Li, Jianlin Shi, Shaojun Dong, Can Li, Daoben Zhu, Jun Lin and K. Lu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact