Carleton University

1.1M citations
43.8k papers ·

Impact in

    • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
    • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Ecology top 1%
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
    • Physiological and biochemical adaptations

Papers in

Carleton University

39.6k papers receiving 1.0M citations

Peers

Carleton University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 52.8k
  • Ecology 101.8k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 47.1k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 11.5k
  • Geophysics 46.0k
Replace Queen's University with:
Queen's University Canada
Université de Montréal Canada
State University of New York United States
Dartmouth College United States
University of Massachusetts Amherst United States
University of Rochester United States
Université du Québec à Montréal Canada
Stony Brook University United States
University of Connecticut United States
Université Laval Canada
Carleton University relative to Queen's University Canada Queen's University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Queen's University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Carleton University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Carleton University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Carleton University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carleton University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Carleton University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Carleton University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Carleton University at the time of their publication.

About Carleton University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Carleton University have published 43.8k papers, which have received a total of 1.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.1k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 470 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, 1.5k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 2.9k papers in Ecology and 5.7k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (932 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (888 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (712 papers), Cooperative Communication and Network Coding (683 papers), Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization (661 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (652 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (525 papers) and Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (515 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (52.8k citations), Ecology (101.8k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (47.1k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (11.5k citations) and Geophysics (46.0k citations). Authors at Carleton University collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Medical Physics, IEEE Access, PLoS ONE and IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. Some of Carleton University's most productive authors include Lenore Fahrig, Kenneth B. Storey, F. Richard Yu, Steven J. Cooke, Tom N. Tombaugh, Hymie Anisman, Maria C. DeRosa, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu, Monique Sénéchal and Christopher A. Higgins.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact