California Institute for Biomedical Research

13.4k citations
265 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

California Institute for Biomedical Research

260 papers receiving 13.1k citations

Peers

California Institute for Biomedical Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Infectious Diseases 1.6k
  • Oncology 1.6k
  • Parasitology 464
  • Developmental Neuroscience 170
  • Organic Chemistry 1.7k
Replace Affymax (United States) with:
Affymax (United States) United States
Institute for Molecular Medicine United States
Joint Center for Structural Genomics United States
Russell/Engleman Rheumatology Research Center United States
Sangamo BioSciences (United States) United States
FibroGen (United States) United States
Geron (United States) United States
Beckman Coulter (United States) United States
Calico Life Sciences United States
XOMA (United States) United States
California Institute for Biomedical Research relative to Affymax (United States) United States Affymax (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Affymax (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at California Institute for Biomedical Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at California Institute for Biomedical Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at California Institute for Biomedical Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California Institute for Biomedical Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at California Institute for Biomedical Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with California Institute for Biomedical Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with California Institute for Biomedical Research at the time of their publication.

About California Institute for Biomedical Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with California Institute for Biomedical Research have published 265 papers, which have received a total of 13.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 22 papers in Parasitology, 39 papers in Infectious Diseases, 26 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 70 papers in Molecular Biology and 20 papers in Oncology on the topics of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (25 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (21 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (17 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (16 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (13 papers), Malaria Research and Control (11 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (11 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (1.6k citations), Oncology (1.6k citations), Parasitology (464 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (170 citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.7k citations). Authors at California Institute for Biomedical Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nature Communications and ACS Chemical Biology. Some of California Institute for Biomedical Research's most productive authors include Peter G. Schultz, Arnab K. Chatterjee, Chan Hyuk Kim, Travis S. Young, Feng Wang, Luke L. Lairson, Case W. McNamara, Xiaozhou Luo, Jun Y. Axup and Elizabeth A. Winzeler.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact