Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage

3.4k citations
331 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage

260 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Conservation 694
  • Earth-Surface Processes 1.2k
  • Archeology 1.2k
  • Space and Planetary Science 139
  • Archeology 58
Replace Palace Museum with:
Palace Museum China
Zhejiang Museum of Natural History China
Shanghai Museum China
Beijing Museum of Natural History China
Anhui Geological Museum China
Dunhuang Research Academy China
Geological Museum of China China
Yunnan Archaeology China
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy China
Jiangxi Academy of Forestry China
Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage relative to Palace Museum China Palace Museum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Palace Museum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage at the time of their publication.

About Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage have published 331 papers, which have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 120 papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 59 papers in Conservation, 141 papers in Archeology, 13 papers in Space and Planetary Science and 10 papers in Archeology on the topics of Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (124 papers), Building materials and conservation (119 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (59 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (38 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (17 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (15 papers), Pigment Synthesis and Properties (13 papers) and Archaeological Research and Protection (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Conservation (694 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (1.2k citations), Archeology (1.2k citations), Space and Planetary Science (139 citations) and Archeology (58 citations). Authors at Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage collaborate with scholars in China, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Cultural Heritage, Heritage Science, Archaeometry, Studies in Conservation and Scientific Reports. Some of Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage's most productive authors include Qinglin Ma, Bingjian Zhang, Qinya Ge, Fuwei Yang, Mingshen Shao, Julin Wang, Xingling Tian, Shuqiang Xu, Shuya Wei and Zuixiong Li.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact