Brigham Young University

1.3M citations
42.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Brigham Young University

37.3k papers receiving 1.2M citations

Peers

Brigham Young University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Clinical Psychology 83.4k
  • Social Psychology 79.9k
  • Accounting 42.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 37.9k
  • Health 26.2k
Replace University of Utah with:
University of Utah United States
Utah State University United States
University of Colorado Boulder United States
Colorado State University United States
University of Nevada, Las Vegas United States
University of New Mexico United States
University of Denver United States
Washington State University United States
University of Colorado System United States
University of California, Riverside United States
Brigham Young University relative to University of Utah United States University of Utah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Utah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Brigham Young University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Brigham Young University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Brigham Young University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brigham Young University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Brigham Young University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Brigham Young University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Brigham Young University at the time of their publication.

About Brigham Young University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Brigham Young University have published 42.2k papers, which have received a total of 1.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.6k papers in Social Psychology, 2.4k papers in Clinical Psychology, 822 papers in Health, 1.3k papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 1.1k papers in Accounting on the topics of Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (810 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (713 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (588 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (511 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (467 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (455 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (428 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (425 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (83.4k citations), Social Psychology (79.9k citations), Accounting (42.1k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (37.9k citations) and Health (26.2k citations). Authors at Brigham Young University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, PLoS ONE, Journal of Chromatography A and Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. Some of Brigham Young University's most productive authors include Keith A. Crandall, David Posada, C. Arden Pope, Randal W. Beard, Michael J. Lambert, Calvin H. Bartholomew, Julianne Holt‐Lunstad, Timothy B. Smith, Douglas W. Dockery and Jeffrey H. Dyer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact